Re: tcptrace-bugs Re: AVL bug-fix available

From: Manikantan Ramadas (mramadas@masaka.cs.ohiou.edu)
Date: 11/15/04


Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:33:05 -0500
From: Manikantan Ramadas <mramadas@masaka.cs.ohiou.edu>
Subject: Re: tcptrace-bugs Re: AVL bug-fix available
Message-ID: <20041115203305.GA15676@masaka.cs.ohiou.edu>


On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 04:43:37PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:52:34AM -0500, Shawn Ostermann wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the valuable information and debugging info. It's very
> > strange that the bug is gone in the newer version even though we can't
> > figure out what would have caused that bug in the things that we
> > changed.
>
> Hmm, definitely something odd then.
>
>
> > I don't suppose that your Internet path is wide enough to transfer that
> > file to us for debugging, is it?
>
> Surely. Is there any readily available way of anonymising the src/dst
> IPs in the trace? (Of course I'll verify that the file still triggers
> the loop after address mangling.)
>

  Ethan Blanton's tcpurify is one program that could handle the address
obfuscation business for you:

http://irg.cs.ohiou.edu/~eblanton/tcpurify

- Mani.

-- 
"'Beauty is truth, truth beauty,'--that is all
  Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know." - John Keats
____________________________________________________________________
  
* Manikantan Ramadas * IRG, OU * http://irg.cs.ohiou.edu/~mramadas *
____________________________________________________________________




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 11/16/04 EST