tcptrace-bugs Packet level module development

From: M. Axworthy (mxzh@comcast.net)
Date: 03/04/06

• Next message: ¹ã·áʵҵ: "tcptrace-bugs ÒԳϺÏ×÷"
• Previous message: info@lakks.com: "tcptrace-bugs $B$3$s$K$A$O(B"
• Next in thread: Shawn Ostermann: "Re: tcptrace-bugs Packet level module development"
• Reply: Shawn Ostermann: "Re: tcptrace-bugs Packet level module development"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Message-ID: <000601c63f55$b76de340$2165ea95@BuffaloFarts>
From: "M. Axworthy" <mxzh@comcast.net>
Subject: tcptrace-bugs Packet level module development
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 22:34:35 -0800

Hi, Is there a way to get into a module at the packet level (e.g. packet by packet) vs. at the connection summary level? Next question: looking to create a grep-like module that can search for specific patterns contained within the packet payload. Does something like this already exist?

• Next message: ¹ã·áʵҵ: "tcptrace-bugs ÒԳϺÏ×÷"
• Previous message: info@lakks.com: "tcptrace-bugs $B$3$s$K$A$O(B"
• Next in thread: Shawn Ostermann: "Re: tcptrace-bugs Packet level module development"
• Reply: Shawn Ostermann: "Re: tcptrace-bugs Packet level module development"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 03/04/06 EST