Re: tcptrace RTT caltulation

From: uaca@alumni.uv.es
Date: 11/13/02


Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:36:41 +0100
Subject: Re: tcptrace RTT caltulation
Message-ID: <20021113203641.GA19201@pusa.informat.uv.es>
From: uaca@alumni.uv.es


Sorry

the first scenario has an errata

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:22:25PM +0100, ulisses wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:39:57PM -0500, Liangping Ma wrote:
> > Hi, Ulisses,
> >
> > I did TCP RTT measurement before. Based on my memory, the tcptrace
> > processes tcpdump raw data, which can be collected in a local ethernet.
> > You are right, that the measurement may not be on one of the end points
> > of a TCP conneciton. But the delay within a LAN is trivial in the case of
> > a long-haul TCP connection. Thus the measurement can be reasonably
> > accurate.
>
>
> Ok, imagine the following two scenarios
>
>
> <Monitorization Host>
> |
> |
> [Host A] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Host B]
> ((((((((((((((((((((((((((<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
           This time is also accounted

regards

        Ulisses

                Debian GNU/Linux: a dream come true
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso

---> Visita http://www.valux.org/ para saber acerca de la <---
---> Asociación Valenciana de Usuarios de Linux <---
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with body containing "unsubscribe tcptrace" to
majordomo@tcptrace.org.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 11/14/02 EST